Sorry, I'm not patient so I filed the ticket:
http://www.macruby.org/trac/ticket/1143
And fixed it in r5215 :D
http://www.macruby.org/trac/changeset/5215/

On Feb 1, 2011, at 8:07 AM, Laurent Sansonetti wrote:

> Like Jordan said :)
> 
> Please file a ticket and we will get this fixed in 0.9. Bugs breaking 
> applications are considered as a priority.
> 
> I think 0.9 should remain 32/64 bits, but the release after may drop 32-bit 
> support (unless people really need it). I can add a note in the 0.9 release 
> notes and then we can see if people complain.
> 
> Laurent
> 
> On Jan 31, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> 
>> Fair enough, I did not realize that you'd already deployed an app based on 
>> MacRuby and had already received bug reports (which suggests that the number 
>> of 32 bit users is clearly non-zero, at least!).  Have you filed a ticket in 
>> trac with a reduction (e.g. the minimum code necessary to demonstrate the 
>> problem) yet?  That will allow us to track and prioritize the work for 
>> possible inclusion in 0.9 (or later, depending on how things go).
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> - Jordan
>> 
>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 2:41 AM, Richard Sepulveda wrote:
>> 
>>> That makes perfectly good sense but i unfortunately started selling a 
>>> MacRuby app on the App Store 
>>> for i386 and 64 bit machines. And a few people are experiencing this issue. 
>>> I was just hoping
>>> for a quick workaround to make them happy. And I would discontinue selling 
>>> the 32 bit version
>>> on the next release.
>>> 
>>> But i can't see anything obvious other than rewriting all of my NSDate 
>>> based code in Objective-C or
>>> waiting for a fix. i include the MacRuby framework in my Pkg so that is 
>>> possible.
>>> 
>>> Richard
>>> 
>>>> Message: 2
>>>> Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:08:38 -0800
>>>> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <j...@apple.com>
>>>> To: "MacRuby development discussions."
>>>>    <macruby-devel@lists.macosforge.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [MacRuby-devel] Strange NSDate behavior building 32 bit v
>>>>    64 bit
>>>> Message-ID: <d31ef44c-06f8-45b1-83b4-7977a32bd...@apple.com>
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>>> 
>>>> I suppose this begs the question:  Does anyone really *require* 32 bit 
>>>> support for MacRuby at this point?  SnowLeopard is already the minimum 
>>>> supported config, and the only Intel 32 bit-only platforms (very early 
>>>> MacBook and Mac Mini configurations) are several years old now.  I don't 
>>>> want to sound like an unfeeling ogre to anyone who actually has such a 
>>>> configuration, mind you, but how big of an installed base does this really 
>>>> represent?
>>>> 
>>>> - Jordan
>>>> 
>>>> On Jan 30, 2011, at 8:49 PM, Vincent Isambart wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>> 1. Modified the Valid Archetectures to "i386 x86_64"
>>>>> 
>>>>> There's a simple way to run macruby (or any other program) on the
>>>>> command line in 32 bits: just add "arch -i386" before the name of the
>>>>> program to execute:
>>>>> $ macruby -v
>>>>> MacRuby 0.9 (ruby 1.9.2) [universal-darwin10.0, x86_64]
>>>>> $ arch -i386 macruby -v
>>>>> MacRuby 0.9 (ruby 1.9.2) [universal-darwin10.0, i386]
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MacRuby-devel mailing list
>>> MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
>>> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> MacRuby-devel mailing list
>> MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
>> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MacRuby-devel mailing list
> MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel

_______________________________________________
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel

Reply via email to