Thanks so much.  I really appreciate it.  I imagine I won't be able to  
hold off on upgrading much longer because itunes 8 has given messages  
that some features may not be available without upgrading.  I really  
do not want to upgrade at this time though.  I don't like too much  
change at once.  I'll wait it out a bit.  I do want to get an iphone  
so I suppose I'll have to update at that time.  :)      ,

Christina
On Sep 14, 2009, at 12:19 PM, Esther wrote:

>
> Hi Christina,
>
> When you click on the "see all" in the search results for the Store in
> iTunes 9, the table is still in the HTML area.  It's a bit like what
> you get in iTunes 8 when you run a search from the Power Search menu
> that you can access from the "Store" menu of the iTunes menu bar (VO-
> M; press "S"; arrow down and press "S" to get to the "Search" option
> and press return), or that you can navigate to by using item chooser
> menu on the iTunes home page or the various music, movie, audiobooks,
> etc. pages when you look for the "Power Search" link.
>
> When you look for results of the search that are in the HTML area --
> say, "Albums", and you VO-Right Arrow past that heading category,
> you'll also find a "see all" link.  When you press that link (VO-
> Space), you get an entire HTML page of album results and no songs
> table when you stop interacting and VO-Down arrow from the HTML area.
> There are also links to navigate to the next page if there are too
> many results to display on a single page.  However, what's different
> is that the album listings are shown in grid view mode instead of list
> view mode in the HTML area, and since the information about artists
> etc. is grouped by the grid entry, you can't sort as you can on a
> table where the data is summarized in columns.
>
> In iTunes 9, the table is still in the HTML area.  I think it takes
> somewhat longer to refresh and display in HTML format than it does for
> a list in plain text, but it's not a terrible difference. I'm guessing
> that Anna had difficulties previewing the later songs in a long list
> on the main search results page, because they probably put the song
> results into a scrolling table to occupy less space, while still
> displaying the album, music videos, other artist, etc. search results
> in the HTML area of the search results page -- just as they do in
> iTunes 8.
>
> On the separate HTML page for the songs table that you get when you
> press the "See All" link you can still sort on the columns.  The only
> thing is, you have to do it the way that sighted users do by clicking
> with your mouse or trackpad or using VO-Shift-Space or pressing "5" on
> the numeric keypad with NumPad Commander, on the title of the column.
> Probably the big thing is that you can't navigate down the columns
> (e.g. sort by Artist name and VO-Down arrow) -- at least I can't in
> Leopard.
>
> There are actually some nice features in iTunes 9 -- the big thing
> being that smart playlists have become much more customizable.  Here's
> a link to an iLounge article about what's new in iTunes 9 followed by
> a partial excerpt about smart playlists:
>
>>
>> http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/iui/articles/instant-expert-secrets-features-of-itunes-9/
>>
>> <begin excerpt>
>> Improved Smart Playlist Rules
>> iTunes 9 finally introduces support for considerably more complex
>> Smart Playlists. In previous versions of iTunes, a Smart Playlist
>> could only be built to either match ALL of the listed criteria or
>> any one of several listed criteria. This meant that you could build
>> a Smart Playlist that selected all music from your “Rock” genre that
>> had never been played, but if you wanted to build a Smart Playlist
>> that selected all Rock and Jazz music that had never been played,
>> you were out of luck. Power users overcame this in the past by
>> building nested playlists for multiple levels of criteria. In iTunes
>> 8 and prior, you would have had to build one Smart Playlist that
>> included all tracks in either the “Rock” or “Jazz” genre, and then
>> build a second Smart Playlist that included tracks from the first
>> Smart Playlist with a Play Count of zero:
>>
> <end excerpt>
>
> I suspect they'll stay with the songs table in the HTML area for
> future versions of iTunes 9, but that they'll improve the navigation
> for VoiceOver in the next minor release.  I have to upgrade to iTunes
> 9 because of its support for the new iPod Touch, and there are new
> syncing options (including, for iPhone and iPod Touch users, the
> ability to update iTunes Store apps individually and links to let you
> check the iTunes Store page descriptions to decide whether you want to
> upgrade.)
>
> HTH
>
> Cheers,
>
> Esther
>
> On Sep 14, 2009, at 08:08, Christina wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a question.  I want to make sure I understand.  One of the
>> reasons I have not upgraded to itunes nine is because of the switch  
>> in
>> the itunes store from the songs table to the table being embedded in
>> the html as an html table.  I like the songs table and use the sort
>> features as well as typing in a few letters to jump down the column.
>> When you click on the see all, what exactly loads?  Is it a songs
>> table that works as it does in itunes 8 or is it just another table  
>> in
>> html, only more results are displayed?
>>
>> Thanks so much and I hope my question makes sense,
>> Christina
>> On Sep 14, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Esther wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Anna,
>>>
>>> What I usually do myself is VO-Right arrow from "Songs" to the "See
>>> all" link and VO-Space.  This loads the table of songs onto a new
>>> page, but takes a while to respond, so if you're looking for a track
>>> that is likely to be matched within the first dozen or so item
>>> listed,
>>> you're better off just doing VO-Right arrow directly into the table.
>>> When you're on the newly loaded HTML page for the songs list, you'll
>>> notice that you can VO-Right arrow to a link for "Next page" if the
>>> results are really long. Also, you can sort on the column headers,
>>> but
>>> only if you are on the fields for the headers of each column for the
>>> table and physically click on the headers with VO-Shift-Space after
>>> routing your mouse cursor to your VoiceOver cursor (VO-Command-F5).
>>> Clicking again reverses sort order.  I don't recommend doing this
>>> unless you just like to experiment, since it takes a while to  
>>> reload,
>>> and I'm not sure that it adds much to the current search. You can't
>>> sort with a context menu or through the VoiceOver Commands menu  
>>> (VO-H
>>> twice).
>>>
>>> I can't VO-Down arrow through any of the columns (in Leopard), for
>>> instance, to look for a specific Artist when I've done a song  
>>> search,
>>> so I think you'd be advised to put in as many fields as you want to
>>> select by when you use the Power Search.
>>>
>>> What may have happened for the first 22 tracks you could preview is
>>> that you were in a scrolling table that didn't update.  That may be
>>> why we're forced to VO-Right arrow through the individual tracks.
>>> You
>>> could try commands like VO-End and VO-Home (to go to end and
>>> beginning, including scrolling).  I think its more robust to press
>>> "See all" and have the songs table load by itself on to a new page
>>> instead of working with results embedded in the HTML area containing
>>> Album results, etc. in terms of working with VoiceOver but it is  
>>> less
>>> responsive in terms of having to wait for the new page to load.
>>>
>>>
>>> HTH
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Esther
>>>
>>> Woody Anna Dresner wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Esther,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the directions for finding and previewing tracks. They
>>>> work
>>>> well for the most part. I was going through a song list of about 50
>>>> songs, and had no trouble previewing the first 22 or so. Then I  
>>>> came
>>>> to a row where the mouse cursor would not route to the vO cursor;  
>>>> it
>>>> would only go to the Apple menu. Still, this is way better than no
>>>> access at all.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Anna
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 14, 2009, at 12:36 AM, Esther wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello James,
>>>>>
>>>>> The songs table is now inside the HTML area of iTunes.  What I do
>>>>> now
>>>>> is, once I am in the HTML area, I bring up item chooser menu (VO- 
>>>>> I)
>>>>> and look for "heading level 2 Songs".  Then I VO-Right arrow to  
>>>>> the
>>>>> name, time, artist, etc. fields.  If you do not have your Mouse
>>>>> cursor
>>>>> following your VoiceOver cursor you will have to route it with VO-
>>>>> Command-F5 when you want to preview the song and click with VO-
>>>>> Shift-
>>>>> Space.  I also use this method of clicking on the "Buy" field to
>>>>> make
>>>>> my purchase.
>>>>>
>>>>> HTH.  Maybe someone else can make suggestions (I'm not upgraded to
>>>>> Snow Leopard yet, but am using iTunes 9).
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Esther
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 13, 2009, James Fettgather wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi to the list.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am really confused about how to purchase a song using Itunes 9.
>>>>>> I type a title into the search field, no problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hit Enter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can find the HTML portion of the Itunes store without  
>>>>>> difficulty
>>>>>> containing all of the albums with the particular song, but the
>>>>>> songs
>>>>>> table listing individual songs is simply missing, pressing VO
>>>>>> right
>>>>>> arrow simply is showing no song table at all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any hints about where the heck is the songs table would sure be
>>>>>> helpful, and thanks a lot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>>
>
>
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to