Hi! Then the question is if mutt is supported with voiceover. If not one could use brltty if one has a braille display. /A 26 jul 2014 kl. 10:57 skrev Steve Holmes <steve.holme...@gmail.com>:
> The Mutt Unix command line mail client seems to support private replies > pretty well. Even when the list forces the normal reply function to go to the > list, Mutt offers you the choice of sending to original sender or to the > list. On the opposite side of the coin, Some lists make it nearly impossible > to reply to the list without having to do a group reply and end up sending a > message to both the original sender and the list. Again, Mutt has a > "List-reply" function which will always send a single message to the list. > Thunderbird also sports a List-Reply function. > > I'm not aware of these official specs being discussed in this thread but at > least some email clients (few) do make it easier to get around on these > mailing lists with their inconsistent implementations. > > On Jul 24, 2014, at 11:51 AM, Sabahattin Gucukoglu <listse...@me.com> wrote: > >> I agree; it's even less fun for list admins and postmasters who now have to >> patch stuff up for no conceivable reason just to keep the messages flowing, >> trust me. The world would be a better place without either Yahoo or AOL, >> and if we could just stop them from posting, our problems would be solved. :) >> >> There is work being done in the relevant groups (and by "Work", I mean >> catering to the damage, because the big guys have already made up their >> minds) to make the behaviour consistent. The best fix I saw was in >> LISTSERV(R), which creates a per-subscriber alias so behaviour continues to >> be exactly as it always was. Sadly, LISTSERV(R) costs $10,000 plus annual >> subscription just for the "Classic" (i.e. not crippled) version, and I ain't >> got that kinda money. >> >> If/when you switch to Mail.app, the critical thing is to check all the >> fields before you send. Each name is an embedded object that reveals the >> address when you click on it, and it can be copied from one field to >> another. So regardless of the behaviour, you can get replies sent where you >> need them to go, even if it's not the easiest thing in the world to do. >> >> Cheers, >> Sabahattin >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "MacVisionaries" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacVisionaries" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
