Hi,

Yes, same here. He knew a little about VoiceOver, but they didn't  
provide training if you required it. In fact, he didn't know how to  
turn it on, so I was glad I read through the entire VoiceOver manual  
before making the trip.

Regards,
Nic
On Oct 3, 2009, at 4:16 PM, Rich Ring wrote:

> My local Apple store doesn't even know that Voiceover exists, well  
> now they do, because I explained it to them.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Chris Hofstader
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 6:46 AM
> Subject: Re: iPhone honored by NFB
>
> My thoughts exactly.  I think the people who read AT reviews fall  
> into two categories: people who work for AT companies/departments  
> and people already using AT who are not likely to switch but enjoy  
> keeping up with the technology conversations.
>
> Most purchasing decisions happen almost entirely apart from the  
> users of AT who rarely are even asked for input.
>
> An odd phenomena though, is the growth of VO and people who seem new  
> to computing or new to participating in discussions about such.   
> Whenever a new person joins any of the three Apple related lists to  
> which I subscribe, I make certain of taking notice of their name.   
> Some are people I've known for years from lots of different lists.   
> A whole lot, maybe even most, seem new to technology lists (I doubt  
> too many are entirely new to computing as finding a list, getting  
> signed up, etc. isn't obvious to the novice).
>
> I know that Apple stores are offering VO training because (I'm  
> guessing) the local Lighthouse or other agencies aren't serving the  
> Mac market.
>
> I'm working on a very large proposal for a really huge project that  
> includes a lot of questions about populations and numbers of users  
> on different AT with a variety of different disabilities.  The only  
> information I can get about Mac users with vision impairment comes  
> from surveys which have the self selection problem (a lot of people  
> do not fill out surveys) which may over or under-estimate  
> MacinBlinks as we've no scientificly gathered data.  Lighthouse and  
> other training centers don't count Macintosh users as they do not  
> train them so, as far as that class of NGO goes, we do not really  
> exist.
>
> As millions of Macs have shipped since the first VO, we've no clue  
> how many blinks are using them, how they are being used, etc.
>
> I would estimate, though, from my entirely unscientific survey of  
> names on mailing lists that Mac is hitting a previously unserved  
> population and doing so well enough for the users to spend time on  
> lists helping each other out.
>
> I do not, however, know how many people are on these lists - the  
> JAWS list has over 900 users last I looked and the Apple oriented  
> seem to have a lot fewer.  Of course, pointing back to the top of  
> the message, if Mac is being used by tons of real novices, then we  
> have no way to get a census of VO use.
>
> Ah... tangled webs and the like...
>
> cdh
>
> To wit:
>
> cdh
> On Oct 2, 2009, at 5:56 PM, Chris Blouch wrote:
>
>> Apple has played the 'let the best technology win in the long run'  
>> game for a while. Maybe that's why they have about 5% market share.  
>> Most people don't care and just get what their network recommend.  
>> So those already leaning towards Apple will cite antagonism and  
>> those leaning away will consider it affirmation. Neither will move  
>> much based on one review.
>>
>> CB
>>
>> Cameron wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi.  It's depressing to think about the potential number of people  
>>> who after
>>> reading that awful so called review, will not end up giving the  
>>> mac platform
>>> a shot.  With all the work apple has done, and continues to do in  
>>> terms of
>>> out of the box accessibility, this is quite unfair.
>>>
>>> Cameron.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rich Ring
>>> Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 7:06 AM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: iPhone honored by NFB
>>>
>>>
>>> I agree, but political entities, whether they are governments,  
>>> political
>>> parties, or the NFB don't tend to admit to their mistakes.  
>>> Unfortunate, but
>>> true.
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "kaare dehard" <[email protected]>
>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 7:54 PM
>>> Subject: Re: iPhone honored by NFB
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I think your right rich, however, their attempt to do this is rather
>>> sad since it would be easier to just admit that they are human like
>>> the rest of us, that an error was made, and then not repeat this.  
>>> That
>>> certainly would have gone some ways to repairing damaged  
>>> credibility.
>>> On 2009-09-30, at 7:14 PM, Rich Ring wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I believe that what you're seeing here is that they're trying to
>>>> make up for
>>>> the grave error they made with the Mac without in fact quite
>>>> admitting they
>>>> were wrong.  You have to read between the lines a bit, but this is
>>>> what I
>>>> firmly believe.
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "ben mustill-rose" <[email protected]>
>>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>>> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 6:34 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: iPhone honored by NFB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I do find it rather funny that they slammed a program that ran on a
>>>> device with a full sized qwerty keyboard yet there all over the  
>>>> iphone
>>>> with its touch screen.
>>>>
>>>> O well - step in the right direction anyway.
>>>>
>>>> On 26/09/2009, Kevin Gibbs <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You have to ask the sighted friend to turn it on in preferences, I
>>>>> think.
>>>>> K.
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: [email protected]
>>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jean- 
>>>>> Philippe
>>>>> Rykiel
>>>>> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 5:30 PM
>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>> Subject: Re: iPhone honored by NFB
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Chris,
>>>>> a friend of mine has one of these. Can you simply tell me how to
>>>>> turn v o
>>>>> on
>>>>> and off on his device so I can give it a try.
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> JPR
>>>>> http://myspace.com/jeanphilipperykiel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: Chris Blouch <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>> Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 12:05 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: iPhone honored by NFB
>>>>>
>>>>> It's called voiceover and as something that makes a device
>>>>> accessible via
>>>>> speech and controls, it is voiceover, but with a different voice  
>>>>> (not
>>>>> Alex)
>>>>> and a phone-specific set of gestures instead of keyboard controls.
>>>>> That
>>>>> said, it's included on every iPhone 3GS and the newer iPod Touch.
>>>>> Previous
>>>>> models didn't have the hardware performance to run this so there  
>>>>> is
>>>>> no
>>>>> upgrade to get VO on the older devices.
>>>>>
>>>>> CB
>>>>>
>>>>> Jean-Philippe Rykiel wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry for a very down-to-earth question, but does the IPhone come
>>>>> with V O
>>>>> as well?
>>>>> JPR
>>>>> http://myspace.com/jeanphilipperykiel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: Chris Blouch <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 10:48 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: iPhone honored by NFB
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Some have difficulty comprehending what is new and, by definition,
>>>>> not
>>>>> well understood. So they define the new in terms of what's known  
>>>>> from
>>>>> the past, but when something is a revolution rather than an  
>>>>> evolution
>>>>> the comparisons fail. Some will lodge those failures as the  
>>>>> fault of
>>>>> what was being measured and dismiss it as being flawed. Others,  
>>>>> more
>>>>> rarely, will correctly realize that the measurement framework has
>>>>> failed
>>>>> and reevaluate their worldview. The NFB has been measuring sharks
>>>>> for a
>>>>> long while and Apple brought in an leopard. It will take time  
>>>>> for the
>>>>> definition of 'good' to be redefined.
>>>>>
>>>>> CB
>>>>>
>>>>> william lomas wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> they can soon praise the iPhone yet slam the mac?
>>>>>> hyppocrits
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Kind regards, BEN.
>>>>
>>>> email: [email protected]
>>>> msn: [email protected]
>>>> web: http://www.bmr.me.uk (under construction)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to