Yes that is why I am looking into this. It does not take long for me
to tune out, especially when reading repetitive material, like file names.
Samantha is good but she ain't human.
From The Believer. . .
. . . what if it were true?
[email protected]
On 2/1/2015 12:47 PM, Shawn Krasniuk wrote:
Hi. I'm not too fond about the new Infovox voices. In my opinion, they've
replaced quality for features like making exclamations and such. I've reported
to this to them and hopefully they'll make better quality voices in the future.
Don't get me wrong, I like that ability to get more expressive when an
exclamation is present, but if your voices sound like crap, at the end of the
day, that's all it is. A feature.
Shawn
Sent From My White MacBook
On Feb 1, 2015, at 2:34 PM, The Believer <[email protected]> wrote:
I am currently using Samantha in Mavericks. I have been thinking about
trying Infovox. Is anyone using those voices? Worth the extra money?
What about the voices in Yosemite? Are there more choices, better quality,
etc?
From The Believer. . .
. . . what if it were true?
[email protected]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
