> On Sep 18, 2015, at 17:16, Shawn Krasniuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've got a question for you guys. If you think El Capitan is a stupid name > for an OS, what would you rather have Apple call it? The only reason they > called it El Capitan is to make additions to Yosemite.
Why even have code names at all? You're going to have to give the exact version number at some point anyway, so what's wrong with, say 10.11, or 10.12? I'd think this would be problematic since a lot of these names are not simple to pronounce especially if your first language doesn't happen to be the same as the language of the code name? When 10.10 came out I noticed several people who use speech exclusively did not know how to spell Yosemite for example. Plus it's better for consistency since iOS has no code names at all, just a version number. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
