Exactly!! things change over time. does anybody remember 8 track tapes, or even just plain old cassettes?? How about those huge 5 and a half inch floppy disks? How about when all the memory you could get was something like 64 megs, and there really wasn’t any portable storage??
yep, progress is good! Cait > On Jun 26, 2016, at 6:24 PM, E.T. <ancient.ali...@icloud.com> wrote: > > Some members here may not go back far enough to the days of the many > choices we had for headphones. Wired, wired, wired, wired, and wired. > (smiles) > > I really do not get this concern over a possible change in hardware that no > one has laid eyes on. But if it is true, its as good as carved in stone (the > 7 is likely off the drawing board by now). And should I need (not want) a new > phone, why, I have faith in Apple in its ability to provide what may be > needed to satisfy connectivity concerns. > > From E.T.'s Keyboard... > Are We Alone in the Universe? > ancient.ali...@icloud.com > > On 6/26/2016 3:09 PM, erik burggraaf wrote: >> All this makes me very glad I'm an android user. Whether the demize of >> the 3.5 mm jack turns out to be a good thing long term or not, I myself >> am not ready to take that step. I can't even really go for bluetooth >> headphones which I'd really like to do because I need wired headphones >> for so many things besides my phone. The bank machine for example. I >> have to have bt headphones that give me the option of plugging in when I >> want to and those headsets are so bulky and so expensive that they >> really aren't useful as wireless headphones. >> >> So, I just bought a $100 android phone that does everything I would want >> to do with an Iphhone, doesn't have nearly as good a screen, but has >> much better battery life and sound system, figures to last me for two >> years or more, and let's me keep the audio jack. >> >> Best, >> >> Erik Burggraaf >> Visit the out of work bum for your chance to win one of 10 KNFB Reader >> or Nearby Explorer for IOS or android! >> http://www.theoutofworkbum.work >> Also check out my website for inclusion to the android platform for >> persons with sensery, physical or cognitive disabilities: >> http://www.inclusiveandroid.com >> >>> On Jun 25, 2016, at 6:39 PM, M. Taylor <mk...@ucla.edu >>> <mailto:mk...@ucla.edu>> wrote: >>> >>> Hello Everyone, >>> >>> Here is an interesting article that I thought you'd like to read, the >>> URL to >>> which is located at the end of the text. >>> >>> NOTE: I edited out the 1 profane word that appears in the original >>> text so >>> as to bring this piece in compliance with our list policies. >>> >>> Enjoy, >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> Taking the headphone jack off phones is user-hostile and stupid, Have some >>> dignity >>> By Nilay Patel on June 21, 2016 >>> >>> Another day, another rumor that Apple is going to ditch the headphone jack >>> on the next iPhone in favor of sending out audio over Lightning. Or >>> another >>> phone beats Apple to the punch by ditching the headphone jack in favor of >>> passing out audio over USB-C. What exciting times for phones! We're so out >>> of ideas that actively making them shittier and more user-hostile is the >>> only innovation left. >>> >>> ditching the headphone jack on phones makes them worse >>> >>> Look, I know you're going to tell me that the traditional TRS >>> headphone jack >>> is a billion years old and prone to failure and that life is about >>> progress >>> and whatever else you need to repeat deliriously into your bed of old HTC >>> extUSB dongles and insane magnetic Palm adapters to sleep at night. >>> But just >>> face facts: ditching the headphone jack on phones makes them worse, in >>> extremely obvious ways. Let's count them! >>> >>> (Also, here is a list of reasons you might actually prefer Lightning >>> headphones, by my friend Vlad Savov, but let's be clear that my list >>> is the >>> superior one.) >>> >>> 1. Digital audio means DRM audio >>> >>> Oh look, I won this argument in one shot. For years the entertainment >>> industry has decried what they call the "analog loophole" of headphone >>> jacks, and now we're making their dreams come true by closing it. >>> >>> Winter is coming >>> >>> Restricting audio output to a purely digital connection means that music >>> publishers and streaming companies can start to insist on digital >>> copyright >>> enforcement mechanisms. We moved our video systems to HDMI and got HDCP, >>> remember? Copyright enforcement technology never stops piracy and always >>> hurts the people who most rely on legal fair use, but you can bet the >>> music >>> industry is going to start cracking down on "unauthorized" playback and >>> recording devices anyway. We deal with DRM when it comes to video >>> because we >>> generally don't rewatch and take TV shows and movies with us, but you will >>> rue the day Apple decided to make the iPhone another 1mm thinner the >>> instant >>> you get a "playback device not supported" message. Winter is coming. >>> >>> 2. Wireless headphones and speakers are fine, not great >>> >>> I am surrounded by wireless speaker systems. (I work at The Verge, after >>> all.) And while they mostly work fine, sometimes they crackle out and >>> fail. >>> It sucks to share a wireless speaker among multiple devices. Bluetooth >>> headphones require me to charge yet another battery. You haven't known >>> pain >>> until you've chosen to use Bluetooth audio in a car instead of an aux >>> jack. >>> >>> Bluetooth: next year it'll work great. >>> >>> 3. Dongles are stupid, especially when they require other dongles >>> >>> Shut up, you say. All of your complaints will be handled by this charming >>> $29 dongle that converts digital audio to a standard headphone jack! >>> >>> Have some dignity >>> >>> To which I will respond: here is a photo of Dieter Bohn and his beloved >>> single-port MacBook, living his fullest #donglelife during our WWDC >>> liveblog: >>> >>> Photo of macbook with a bunch of dongles >>> >>> Everything is going to be great when you want to use your expensive >>> headphones and charge your phone at the same time. You are going to love >>> everything about that situation. You are going to hold your 1mm thinner >>> phone and sincerely believe that the small reduction in thickness is >>> definitely worth carrying multiple additional dongles. >>> >>> Also, they're called [redacted] dongles. Let's not do this to ourselves. >>> Have some dignity. >>> >>> 4. Ditching a deeply established standard will disproportionately impact >>> accessibility >>> >>> The traditional headphone jack is a standard for a reason - it works. It >>> works so well that an entire ecosystem of other kinds of devices has built >>> up around it, and millions of people have access to compatible devices at >>> every conceivable price point. The headphone jack might be less good >>> on some >>> metrics than Lightning or USB-C audio, but it is spectacularly better than >>> anything else in the world at being accessible, enabling, open, and >>> democratizing. A change that will cost every iPhone user at least $29 >>> extra >>> for a dongle (or more for new headphones) is not a change designed to >>> benefit everyone. And you don't need to get rid of the headphone jack to >>> make a phone waterproof; plenty of waterproof phones have shipped with >>> headphone jacks already. >>> >>> 5. Making Android and iPhone headphones incompatible is so incredibly >>> arrogant and stupid there's not even explanatory text under this one >>> >>> 6. No one is asking for this >>> >>> Raise your hand if the thing you wanted most from your next phone was >>> either >>> fewer ports or more dongles. >>> >>> I didn't think so. You wanted better battery life, didn't you? >>> Everyone just >>> wants better battery life. >>> >>> Original article at: >>> http://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2016/6/21/11991302/iphone-no-headphon >>> e-jack-user-hostile-stupid >>> >>> -- >>> The following information is important for all members of the Mac >>> Visionaries list. >>> >>> If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, >>> or if you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact >>> the owners or moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself. >>> >>> Your Mac Visionaries list moderator is Mark Taylor and your owner is >>> Cara Quinn - you can reach Cara at caraqu...@caraquinn.com >>> >>> The archives for this list can be searched at: >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/macvisionaries@googlegroups.com/ >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. >>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> The following information is important for all members of the Mac >> Visionaries list. >> >> If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or >> if you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the >> owners or moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself. >> >> Your Mac Visionaries list moderator is Mark Taylor and your owner is >> Cara Quinn - you can reach Cara at caraqu...@caraquinn.com >> >> The archives for this list can be searched at: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/macvisionaries@googlegroups.com/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "MacVisionaries" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >> an email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> <mailto:macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. >> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com >> <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>. >> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries > list. > > If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if > you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or > moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself. > > Your Mac Visionaries list moderator is Mark Taylor and your owner is Cara > Quinn - you can reach Cara at caraqu...@caraquinn.com > > The archives for this list can be searched at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/macvisionaries@googlegroups.com/ > --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacVisionaries" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > <Ancient_Aliens.vcf> -- The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries list. If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself. Your Mac Visionaries list moderator is Mark Taylor and your owner is Cara Quinn - you can reach Cara at caraqu...@caraquinn.com The archives for this list can be searched at: http://www.mail-archive.com/macvisionaries@googlegroups.com/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
