I wonder what the difference might have been had they used an iPhone 7 and set up a plus against the pixel. It has less ram. Would that of made any difference? Same chip, so maybe not. It seems like four things that matter to us, that is not games, they're pretty close. The pixel even did a little better and somethings. So if you're not doing heavy lifting like games, or other things that really tax the chip, it may be a draw or close to one. Mary
Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 21, 2016, at 7:56 PM, Scott Granados <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thought some might find this interesting, especially since Apple wins. > > Well, some of you can probably guess how this turns out since I’m posting.:) > > Here’s an interesting speed test that shows the difference in performance > between the flagship iPhone 7+ and a Pixel. A Pixel was used to insure the > resolutions were as close as possible and to not favor one over the other by > the number of pixels (graphics elements) being generated. On simple > applications the Pixel does well. Things like the calculator and twitter are > very close and sometimes favor the Pixel. On Bench marks, the Pixel isn’t > even in the game. The iPhone crushes the pixel so score one for the A10 over > the Snapdragon. On more complex applications like gaming there’s no contest, > the iPhone smokes the Pixel. Both single core and multicore performance on > the pixel pales in comparison to the iPhone 7+. I’d have liked to have seen > more network tests because I think the Pixel would win but this video doesn’t > contain much in that area. The Pixel is starting to find it’s way and be a > competitor to Apple but it’s not there yet, especially on complex tasks. At > least on simple applications it’s not a blood bath like previous years but > the heavy lifting is still got a long way to go for Google. This plays along > with what I’ve been saying about the inferior Snapdragon processors and other > companies doing more exciting things with mobile processors like Samsung, > several Chinese manufacturers and of course Apple. > > View the tests here > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejWHaGjSQGs > > -- > The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries > list. > > If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if > you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or > moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself. > > Your Mac Visionaries list moderator is Mark Taylor. You can reach mark at: > [email protected] and your owner is Cara Quinn - you > can reach Cara at [email protected] > > The archives for this list can be searched at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacVisionaries" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries list. If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself. Your Mac Visionaries list moderator is Mark Taylor. You can reach mark at: [email protected] and your owner is Cara Quinn - you can reach Cara at [email protected] The archives for this list can be searched at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
