Hi, i take Samantha over trinoids, boing, bad news and the other unnecessary 
stuff any day.
/Krister

16 okt 2010 kl. 17.30 skrev Carolyn Haas:

> Eric:
> On the subject of  voiceover voicing, how come they only give breathing 
> capability to Alex?  Also, I wonder why the other voices they have seem so 
> weak by comparison?  Finally, in defense of Samaantha, I like her voice.  it 
> seems to me to be the strongest option besides Alex; at least on the iPhone.  
> On the mac, if she's there under another name, she's not as strong.  As a 
> hearing impaired person, I've found the voicing on the iPad the easiest of 
> all of the Apple voices to understand.  But, that's just me.  
> I'm interested in other people's thoughts on this.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Carolyn Haas
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 16, 2010, at 6:33 AM, erik burggraaf wrote:
> 
>> I'd like to see better html5 support.  It's working more or less, but it 
>> could be better.  Improved calendar and garage band accessibility.  and a 
>> female voice just so as I could change it up once in a while.  If they 
>> outsource voices from nuance I'm going to scream.  There's no reason to buy 
>> aweful when we have acapela which is far better.  If they would licence 
>> acapela I'd be right there, but please please please save me from samantha.
>> 
>> Grade two braille input is a must.  I also want the magnification to go up 
>> to 10 times without pixalating.  The magnification stuff has got to improve 
>> to a point where it's on a par with the rest of voiceover.
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Erik Burggraaf
>> User support consultant,
>> One on one access technology support and training over the phone or in 
>> person,
>> 1-888-255-5194
>> http://www.erik-burggraaf.com
>> 
>> On 2010-10-15, at 1:43 PM, Krister Ekstrom wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> I would really love to see other voices in other languages and that they 
>>> ditched those trinoids, good news, bad news, boing and other nonsence 
>>> voices that belonged in the days when they didn't really know what to do 
>>> with synthetic speech, because they hadn't a screen reader then. Nowadays, 
>>> there is Voiceover so then other voices in other languages are more 
>>> appropriate, especially since the screen reader itself is actually 
>>> localized into other languages than english.
>>> Other than that, i would love to see a better translation to Swedish of 
>>> Voiceover and the feature that the old Outspoken had, namely theability to 
>>> know where the cursor was, by hearing a beep when you spell a word, so that 
>>> if you had the word "browser" for example and you are in the middle of the 
>>> word, just between the "w" and "s", you could hear "b r o w beep s e r" and 
>>> if you then went one step to the right with the cursor, it'd go "b r o w s 
>>> beep e r" and so on.
>>> Permanent hot spots savable on a per application basis would also be nice.
>>> And i totally agree with more accessibility of the ILife suite would be 
>>> wonderful.
>>> /Krister
>>> 
>>> 15 okt 2010 kl. 19.25 skrev Daniel Rowe:
>>> 
>>>> Hi all.
>>>> 
>>>> As you might be aware, apple are holding a "Back To The Mac" event next 
>>>> Wednesday at 10 eastern in Cupertino, California.  There are rumours of 
>>>> possible upgrades to the MacBook Air and also the unveiling of MAC OS X 
>>>> 10.7.
>>>> So, what would you like to see included in next  version of the OS, either 
>>>> generally or VoiceOver specific?
>>>> 
>>>> Personally, I'd like to see  a female voice that is as good as Alex, and 
>>>> to have voices in other languages even if it meant licensing them from 
>>>> nuance as they have done in iOS.
>>>> Accessibility improvements to garage band would be welcome, as well as 
>>>> making iWeb accessible.
>>>> The last major thing I can think of is to finally fix the issue of VO 
>>>> randomly resetting itself.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm sure they'll come up with a load of things I haven't even thought of.  
>>>> So what do you all think?
>>>> 
>>>> Dannie
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to