Hi Chris: Do yourself and all of us a favor: Step away from the computer and chill for a while before writing a pointless rave like this. No one really needs to hear it.
On Jul 22, 2011, at 6:37 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland wrote: > Not exactly that anyone would really want! to download this, but, why in the > heck is it, that if I go to either > > http://www.freedomscientific.com > > Or: > > http://www.hj.com > > Take your pick, for one, I am finding the item chooser stuff happening here > as well, if you do vo+I then type d o w... stick with me, it gets even > weirder than item choser stuff... I'm just setting some ground... anyway, if > you hit vo+i, then do d o w, you won't get the downloads link, yet if you use > vo+U and go to links in the roter, then! do it, it works, then go to jaws for > windows screen reading software, then try to find the jaws 12 download link, > if you hit vo+space on that link, Safari says the page cannot be found. Now, > here's the weird part. If I try this from my xp pro sp3 machine with either > I E, or Firefox, then hit enter on the link, same network l A n, same public > I P address, same internet connection, etc. same d h c p, same d n s, same > router, nothing changes but the platform, the download works like a charm! > Let me say this, no jokes. I've had a really rough day, and quite frankly am > not in the mood for the smart mouth comments, like, well yeah, Jobs hates FS > so he blocked you from the site, or why would you compare jaws to VO, or want > to download the fish... you may have a point, but no you really don't, OK. > This isn't about one screen reader being better than another. this is about > the item chooser, and the router, and the downloading in Safari consistently > across many pages be very inconsistently odd in behavior. Take it as such. > If you can't offer anything resourcesful and just wanna throw lookie jokes > around, look, I'm not tonight as I would normally be, in the mood for it. > OK? Please, if you all test and find the same thing, let me know. I'd be > interested if anyone knows why the things in Safari have to be so d*** > annoying. I'm frustrated yes, the mods could say that and that I need to > chill, and I'm willing to, but people, come on! I mean, really, one could > argue, I'm not the one who decided to jup into Lion right away. You're > right. Perhaps I jumped the gun too soon. But, that really isn't your right > to say. The thing is, I'm getting more stressed with the Lion update by the > minute. What ticks me off more though is Apple doesn't seem to give a rat's > butt one way or another, ar at least it doesn't appear that way, but I'll > explain more about that in another more rellavant post. It's making my > experience though not very enjoyable, I tell ya that! though. > > Chris. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacVisionaries" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
