Dave Neary wrote:
> For the last election, at 10, we would have included about 1000
> maemo.org accounts, at 25 we would have included about 450.
Very interesting. So it is actually at least 1/2 of the ~900 people that voted
last time who would not be allowed to vote with the karma limit of 25?! (Of
course the karma rating has changed now, but still...)
Please be so kind and tell us the exact number of actual active voters with a
karma >25 from the last election to see how the real ratio is then. And what
the ratio would be with a limit of 10.
> I think there's an argument to be made that 25 might be too high, but
> let's get more up to date figures before we close that discussion. I
> think 100 would definitely be too high. And given what you say
> afterwards, I think that you think this too.
Well it really depends on what the definition of "Maemo Community" is. If only
real contributors are considered part of the community, 100 seems reasonable
and it also would make (massive) fraud nearly impossible.
Markus
_______________________________________________
maemo-community mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
