On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Jac Kersing <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Please excuse my butting in, however I would like to ask a serious
> question:
No excusing necessary.
> Whom do you think might be more knowledgable and (imho) in a better
> position to vote on council members:
> 1) Someone reading the various maemo lists, including the discussions on
> this list.
> 2) Someone posting development related questions on the maemo-developers
> list.
> 3) Someone rating downloadable software on maemo.org.
It's a good point. There are two answers, I can see:
1) This is the fundamental problem with karma, and so the requirement
should be scrapped.
2) This is a minor hole in the current karma calculation you've
identifed, and so someone should get points for being subscribed
to a mailing list (n for being subscribed, 0.6n for being subscribed
with the digest, say).
What do _you_ think?
Cheers,
Andrew
--
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:[email protected] | http://www.bleb.org/
Maemo Community Council member
_______________________________________________
maemo-community mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
