Dave Neary wrote:
> I don't mean to be a pest about this... but the discussion about what
> the various proposals for the referenda would be moved off-list and was
> discussed by the council at one stage (after a long & sometimes heated
> discussioon which, admittedly, didn't look like it would get a final
> result), so feedback was difficult for people outside of the council &
> myself during that time.

Which reminds me - do you (members of council) remember discussion about 
[email protected] address and what it will be used for? People were 
agains creating this alias for this very reason that discussion which 
should be in [email protected] moves to [email protected].

Maybe there should be written rules? Like

1. stuff which Nokia wants to keep secret for limited time (coordination 
of upcoming releases/services/changes related to maemo.org)

2. nothing else?

Can some member of current council describe from past experience how 
much traffic went to [email protected] and what was the rationale behind 
preferring it over [email protected]?

Or what about real [email protected] mailing list with public archive if 
you feel community@ is too wide?

Frantisek
_______________________________________________
maemo-community mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community

Reply via email to