Hi, Not much that was open to the greater community, actually. We had some debmaster hiring talk, some SDK talk, some itT moving to talk.maemo.org talk, and then a little council election talk (which was fairly quickly moved to the community- List.
Honestly, I feel like the council@ email address has been used wisely and that most of the "rules," while unspoken, have been adhered to. Tim -- http://tim.samoff.com Frantisek Dufka wrote: > Dave Neary wrote: >> I don't mean to be a pest about this... but the discussion about what >> the various proposals for the referenda would be moved off-list and was >> discussed by the council at one stage (after a long & sometimes heated >> discussioon which, admittedly, didn't look like it would get a final >> result), so feedback was difficult for people outside of the council & >> myself during that time. > > Which reminds me - do you (members of council) remember discussion about > [email protected] address and what it will be used for? People were > agains creating this alias for this very reason that discussion which > should be in [email protected] moves to [email protected]. > > Maybe there should be written rules? Like > > 1. stuff which Nokia wants to keep secret for limited time (coordination > of upcoming releases/services/changes related to maemo.org) > > 2. nothing else? > > Can some member of current council describe from past experience how > much traffic went to [email protected] and what was the rationale behind > preferring it over [email protected]? > > Or what about real [email protected] mailing list with public archive if > you feel community@ is too wide? > > Frantisek > _______________________________________________ > maemo-community mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community > _______________________________________________ maemo-community mailing list [email protected] https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
