On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 17:28 +0100, ext Neil MacLeod wrote:

> I've produced the following subset of broad categories for consideration:
> 
> Communications
> Games
> Graphics
> Multimedia
> Office (or perhaps Business Tools?)
> Programming
> Support
> Themes
> Utilities (or perhaps Tools?)
> 
> Something like FBReader should probably go in the Office category (as it 
> relates to document viewing though not necessarily Word/Excel format), which 
> suggests Office may not be a good title... maybe a Document Viewer category 
> (distinct from document creation tools which should be in "Office").
> 
> Applications such as xterm would be categorised as Utilities. Dropbear and 
> ssh could be categorised as Utilities *OR* Communications - should all 
> command line tools be placed in a single category for that purpose or treated 
> the same as GUI packages? Perhaps a "Command Line" category would be 
> appropriate.
> 
> Pidgin would be categorised as Communications, however Pidgin protocols might 
> be categorised as Support, as would any locales (eg. Skype). However in order 
> to simplify installation for the user there may be an argument to keep all 
> packages associated with the main application in the same category, such that 
> all Pidgin sound and protocol packages are categorised as "Communications" 
> too.
> 
> Any thoughts?

I'd like to see some separation between tools that a casual user could
find interesting (for example extension of format previews for the file
manager / archive management / disk space graphical visualisation) and
what a power user would consider as tools (for example xterm / extension
to the collection of command line utiilities provided by busybox).

So, for example, wget would end up in the latter category, while a
graphical UI for wget or a graphical ftp would end up in the former.

-- 
Cheers, Igor

Igor Stoppa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Nokia Multimedia - CP - OSSO / Helsinki, Finland)
_______________________________________________
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Reply via email to