On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Graham Cobb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 25 August 2008 12:30:24 Stephen J. Gadsby wrote: >> > Hi, I am missing bug >> > >> > https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3619 - Tasknavigator icon sizes >> > and usage not documented >> >> This is a web site bug, and the Bug Jar stopped including those a few weeks >> ago. It focuses on just Maemo software now, as several people commented the >> web site bugs were unnecessary noise in the summaries. > > It is not a web site bug. Documentation bugs are bugs in the software, not > the website. "Feature X does not work as documented" and "Feature X is not > documented as it works (or at all)" are EXACTLY THE SAME as far as the user > of the feature are concerned. An excellent feature, that is not documented, > is useless and is effectively missing. I care as little about whether the > problem is found to be in the software or the documentation as I do about > whether the bug is file_a.c or file_b.c. > > Personally I am not particularly keen on the web site bugs having been removed > from the bug jar -- I would prefer to see them have their own section but the > metrics that the bug jar shows are just as important for web site bugs. In > particular, ones owned by Nokia (as opposed to the community) should be > tracked in the bug jar. >
Personally, I'd like to see the maemo.org bugs have their own bug jar. If only to teach the Maemo Software people a thing or two about bugzilla use. *g* _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
