Am Mittwoch, den 23.09.2009, 11:07 +0100 schrieb Andrew Flegg: > It's easy to find problems, but our basic QA procedure started off as > "installs cleanly, uninstalls cleanly, doesn't waste battery, has > human readable description, has nice icons" and now "uses /opt and > doesn't waste disk space if appropriate". These are detailed at: > > http://wiki.maemo.org/Extras-testing#Quality_criteria > > Should someone be pressing thumbs up if a package meets those > requirements and has no blocking/crashing bugs? That doesn't seem to > be happening - is it because no-one's testing, or because no-one feels > clear as to what they should be doing?
I must admit that so far I've considered giving a Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down to be a purely subjective decision based on personal impression. I for myself e.g. would give a Thumbs Down for a very small, working app if the main menu is not fremantle'ized (as the maintainer does not have a large codebase to maintain this should not be too hard), but that would not be much of an issue to me for a large complicated app (lots of other more important stuff to maintain and work correctly). That's why others can still vote +1 if I said -1 and the other way round - I assume everybody has his/her own ideas about thresholds and expectations and that's exactly why there's more than one person allowed && required to vote. Just my current point of view, andre -- Andre Klapper (maemo.org bugmaster) _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
