please accept huge apologies for spelling of your name Aniello :$
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:03 PM, gary liquid <liq...@gmail.com> wrote: > :) > > this has been a good informative discussion. > since we are working on beta, can i suggest something. > > anidels point about app feedback *from the device itself* is important. > > if me as a user selects extras testing and installs a an app because anidel > said his new version is there > from that moment on, it should be the device itself that monitors the > process. > > in the same way the crash reporter pops up and asks a question after a > crash, can we discuss a path to similar for testing apps? > perhaps if the app itself in testing had a flag added to its desktop file > (or some other way, a list perhaps *hand waving*) > and when the user has run the app they are testing, or 1/2/12/24 hours > after installing the user was directly asked > > "what are your feelings on this app?" > > it would give control directly to the testers and remove the disconnect > that currently occurs - I for one have major problems maintaining a big long > list of places and sites and things I should look for and the packages list > overwhelms me with multiple versions and complex filenames which mean > nothing to me as a user. > the app is installed on my tablet, it is a computer, it knows the version, > it knows the url path - i can give valuable feedback there and then. > > i dont know how practical or complex an app of this nature would be, but we > have enough toolkits and developers around who might help code something up. > it should even go through extras-testing itself! > > gary > > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Aniello Del Sorbo <ani...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> 2009/9/24 Andre Klapper <aklap...@openismus.com>: >> > Am Donnerstag, den 24.09.2009, 11:48 +0100 schrieb Aniello Del Sorbo: >> >> My only complaint is on who has the final word. >> > >> > Again: It is the package maintainer, after his/her package has been >> > given 10 karma points by testers. >> > >> > andre >> > -- >> > Andre Klapper (maemo.org bugmaster) >> > >> >> Thus I guess we need to work on what those testers should work. >> Is this being done? >> >> And what about the second part of the proposal? >> >> -- >> anidel >> Sent from London, Eng, United Kingdom >> _______________________________________________ >> maemo-developers mailing list >> maemo-developers@maemo.org >> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers >> > >
_______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
