On Tuesday 29 December 2009 13:07:36 Mohammed Hassan wrote: > On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 16:57 +0100, ext Tim Teulings wrote: > > Hallo! > > > > > In sum, what is the upside of including anything but symlinks on the > > > NAND? IMHO, it should punt everything to /opt as long as it is needed > > > at all. > > > > > > Thanks for maemo-optify, it makes things sooooo much > > > lazier^H^H...easier. :) > > > > Symlinks take space on disk, too. I'm not sure if they take a whole block > > or a part of it but there is likely a limit where a links costs more > > space than the data itself. Is this where the 2K come from?
I didn't check for sure, but I don't think symlinks take anywhere near 2k. > Perhaps it's the time to symlink directories ? ;-) ln -s /opt/etc /etc/opt http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#ETCOPTCONFIGURATIONFILESFOROPT But a bit OT. -Jeff _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
