Dan Ritter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 04:17:57PM -0700, Mark wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Henrik Madsen <h...@imm.dtu.dk> wrote: >> >>> If you have never had an issue with stability on Windows Mobile >>> you are the blind person. Almost all producers of mobile phones >>> are now leaving Windows Mobile and considering Linux devices >>> instead. Are you hired by Microsoft?? >>> >>> >> Yeah, I'm a Micro$oft fanboy, that's why I run Linux on all my machines... >> >> I've never had an issue with stability on Windows Mobile because I've >> never had a Windows Mobile device. What I said was that "I've never >> _heard_" of Windows Mobile devices being reflashed like Linux devices. >> That also goes for PalmOS devices, Symbian devices, SX0 devices, >> etc... >> > > PalmOS was patched with ROM reflashes at least twice during the > times I was using a Palm Pro, III, IIIx, and at least once when > I was using a Treo 700P. > > -dsr- >
There was a minor PalmOS patch for my Visor, but it was just an added patch that resided in the user space, not an OS reflash. Flashing the OS on Visors wasn't possible - it was strictly ROM. I didn't notice any difference resulting from the patch, either, so it couldn't have been anything major. Mark _______________________________________________ maemo-users mailing list maemo-users@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
