atilla ontas wrote: > I'm just wondering if we follow Mandriva's release cycle model.
(...) > One more thing. Do we follow Mandriva's release naming scheme? I.e. do > we call our first release 2011.x ? I don't like this naming scheme and > suggesting using number of release as naming like Mageia 1.0 or using > code names. > What's your opinion? What about doing both : o First a conservative rolling distribution. There's a lot of demand for that kind of distribution, even Debian seems to think about a stable testing. It would be the way to use Mageia for the average desktop user. o In addition an about-1-year release cycle distribution, a "snapshot" of the rolling one, supported 2 years, more suitable for entreprise/server use or for people with very low internet bandwith. I'm not certain it would be more time consuming than a 6 month release cycle, and it would please a lot of people.
