On 5 October 2010 15:54, Dale Huckeby <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Ahmad Samir wrote: > >> Actually yes, it's one of the - rather rare - cases where upstream, >> OOo, offers readily installable binary rpms :) >> (although you have to bear in mind that the openoffice version in the >> Mandriva repos was the http://go-oo.org/ version, which has a saner >> build system and is easier to maintain). > > Not wanting to be confrontational, just curious. Are "saner build > system" and "easier to maintain" relevant to the user, which he should > take into account in making his choice, or are they mainly relevant > to developers/maintainers? > > Thanks, > Dale Huckeby >
Mainly for developers/maintainers. Also go-oo has some features that ooo doesn't have (I can't remember those off hand), that would be relevant for users. -- Ahmad Samir
