Le lundi 29 novembre 2010 17:11:08, Olivier Thauvin a écrit : > * Samuel Verschelde ([email protected]) wrote: > > > > Le lundi 29 novembre 2010 15:24:04, Samuel Verschelde a écrit : > > > > > > Le lundi 29 novembre 2010 14:56:20, Michael Scherer a écrit : > > > > - complexity over time of support because package move from main to > > > > contribs and viceversa. Especially when there is some backports from > > > > a software in main that would requires a software in contribs, etc. > > > > > > Indeed, this is a pain :) > > > > > > > It's a pain, but the policy saying a supported package must rely on other > > supported packages is not totally bad. I hope whatever the mirror structure > > we will enforce such a policy (with changes maybe, or exceptions). > > IMHO, the mirror structure do not have to be designed to reflect logical > structure. At least until someone write a multidimensionnal filesystem > able to represent all link rpms can have between them. >
Same opinion here. This poorly written english sentence meant that, independently of the mirror structure, I hope such a policy will be adopted. Regards Samuel
