Le jeudi 23 décembre 2010 15:29:15, Ahmad Samir a écrit : > > On 23 December 2010 01:43, Samuel Verschelde <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > In fact I think Frederic was talking about several versions of the same > > package, not necessarily several versions of the distribution. However, I > > don't think we can or should ask people to write down every package version > > which has the bug. > > > > We can guess many things automatically, provided the information is of good > > quality (the RPM/SRPM field always has a complete filename in it, and all > > affected versions of the distribution are flagged, whatever the way used > > for that : multivalue field when it'll be possible, whiteboard > > meanwhile...). > > > > For those who don't wan't to read everything, example 1 may be enough, I'm > > just trying to cover several cases, not that every case brings something > > really important to the discussion. My point in those examples is that we > > can provide useful information regarding bugs on packages in software > > managers or mageia-app-db, but that depends on the information present in > > the bug reports, that's what I'd like this to be taken into account in bug > > handling processes. > > > > [...] > > This thread is about bugzilla configuration and setup not mageia-app-db... >
I'm quite puzzled by this answer. I was talking about the impacts of bugzilla configuration on what useful information we will be able to give to users outside of bugzilla. Apparently this is off-topic. Regards Samuel Verschelde
