2011/1/6 Michael Scherer <[email protected]>: > Le jeudi 06 janvier 2011 à 17:05 +0100, Dexter Morgan a écrit : >> After reading the various mails i think we coulddo like this >> >> >> Product : Mageia >> >> Componments: >> >> - Documentation >> - Installation >> - RPM packages >> - New Packages requests >> - Release Media >> - Security >> - Translations > > Could you explain what kind of bug would go in every category ? > > For exemple, translation would apply to what kind of bug, same goes for > documentation ? > > If we have a separate documentation, wouldn't it be more logical to have > it as a product, with various subcomponent like each manual ?
I think he is referring to errors in the documentation like wrong screenshots or whatever. This could go into the rpm section, provided that the official documentation will bne distributed as a package (as in mandriva-doc-*) > For translation, shouldn't it be attached to either a software, a > website, a document than be separate ? This is more a philosophical question. If translation bugs are filed in a separate category it makes it easy for the translators and normal package section is not clogged by this. Example: translation bugs could be generally triaged to i18n group if in a separate category. If the translation bug of foo.rpm is in the normal package category trieage team has to read the description to find out that it is not a program/packager bug but a translation but, then hand it to i18n. -- wobo
