2011/4/4 Thomas Lottmann <[email protected]>: > Le 04/04/2011 13:44, James Kerr a écrit : >> >> On 04/04/11 10:49, Donald Stewart wrote: >>> >>> On 4 April 2011 10:35, Anne nicolas<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi there >>>> >>>> While working on beta1 isos, looks like recent improvement in deps >>>> management for base system made some more free space. I know have 30 >>>> Mo available to add more packages. Just keep in mind that dual content >>>> is both 32 and 64 bits and focus on minimal installation and >>>> diagnostic tools >>>> >>>> Here is the current list: >>>> http://zarb.org/~ennael/mageia-dual-1-Beta1-dual.idx >>>> >>>> Feel free to comment >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Anne >>>> http://www.mageia.org >>>> >>> >>> mc would be nice. Otherwise the list looks good. >>> >> >> I agree. nano would also be useful. (At least one of those two should be >> included.) A few of us still haven't mastered vi. :) >> > > I don't want to start a flamewar or something, but keep in mind that there > are several people, pretty much unexperienced with Linux and keyboard > shortcuts or combining them. They might be lost or in difficulty if nano is > installed on it's own. mc or mcedit isn't too heavy and so easy to use that > it would be a good idea, in my opinion, to include it. > > This is from my own experience. Now, I can manage to learn how to use nano > or vi (I use emacs personally), but editing in text console was such a pain > when I started using Linux until I found out about mcedit. So... > > Couldn't it be possible to installed both mcedit (basic) and nano (advanced) > then? Its not like if they were heavy...
dual iso is not planned to target unexperienced users.... no proprietary drivers, very minimal interface... So even if I can understand your explanation it seems to be a bit off topic for this iso > -- Anne http://www.mageia.org
