2011/4/4 Wolfgang Bornath <[email protected]>: > 2011/4/4 Thomas Lottmann <[email protected]>: >> Le 04/04/2011 14:13, Anne nicolas a écrit : >>> >>> 2011/4/4 Thomas Lottmann<[email protected]> >>>> >>>> I don't want to start a flamewar or something, but keep in mind that >>>> there >>>> are several people, pretty much unexperienced with Linux and keyboard >>>> shortcuts or combining them. They might be lost or in difficulty if nano >>>> is >>>> installed on it's own. mc or mcedit isn't too heavy and so easy to use >>>> that >>>> it would be a good idea, in my opinion, to include it. >>>> >>>> This is from my own experience. Now, I can manage to learn how to use >>>> nano >>>> or vi (I use emacs personally), but editing in text console was such a >>>> pain >>>> when I started using Linux until I found out about mcedit. So... >>>> >>>> Couldn't it be possible to installed both mcedit (basic) and nano >>>> (advanced) >>>> then? Its not like if they were heavy... >>> >>> dual iso is not planned to target unexperienced users.... no >>> proprietary drivers, very minimal interface... So even if I can >>> understand your explanation it seems to be a bit off topic for this >>> iso >>> >> >> You are right. Forgot the target of the dual iso... My apologies. > > Well, Thomas' reason for mcedit put aside I also vote for mc. I've > been using the original in MSDOS and through all the years mc has been > the first package I installed in all my Linux installations (if it was > not installed by default), even in such a rescue system like grlm. It > is a very handy file manager for the text console, editor as well. I > even used it as main menue in an xterm in a minimal installation. > > So, although I know my way in vi(m) I'd strongly recommend to give mc a > chance.
mc included. vbox additions are too big to go there unfortunatelly > > -- > wobo > -- Anne http://www.mageia.org
