Le jeudi 28 avril 2011 à 10:39 +0200, Anne nicolas a écrit : > 2011/4/28 Thierry Vignaud <[email protected]>: > > On 28 April 2011 10:08, Remco Rijnders <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1016 > >>> > >>> D Morgan <[email protected]> changed: > >>> > >>> What |Removed |Added > >>> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> AssignedTo|[email protected] |[email protected] > >>> CC| |[email protected] > >>> > >>> --- Comment #1 from D Morgan <[email protected]> 2011-04-28 12:02:52 > >>> CEST --- > >>> i started to work on it. > >> > >> Given our target audience and seeing how this is going to be our first full > >> release, perhaps this should be release blocking? WDYT? > > > > About the license issue, isn't that a non issue: > > $ rpm -qp --qf '%{license}\n' > > mandriva-doc-installer-help-2010.1-1.0mdv2010.1.noarch.rpm > > Open Publication License > > > > There's no additional restrictions neither in the package nor in its > > mandriva-doc SRPM > > > > In documentation > > "Copyright © 2009 Mandriva SA > > This material may only be distributed subject to the terms and > conditions set forth in the Open Publication License, v1.0 or later > (the latest version is presently available at opencontent.org). > > Distribution of substantively modified versions of this document is > prohibited without the explicit permission of the copyright holder. > > Distribution of the work or derivatives of the work in any standard > (paper) book form is prohibited unless prior permission is obtained > from the copyright holder." > > > When we had a look on it we discovered that it could be a full > copyleft license provided there is no restriction. Which is not the > case for Mandriva > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Publication_License. This has been > checked also with Neodoc who worked on it for years
What about then a message stating that we didn't finished the cleaning in time and so on ? -- Michael Scherer
