On Saturday, June 11, 2011 02:52:43 pm Pascal Terjan wrote: > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 17:00, Thomas Spuhler <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Saturday, June 11, 2011 03:33:18 am Olivier Blin wrote: > >> Jerome Quelin <[email protected]> writes: > >> > hi, > >> > > >> > perl 5.14.0 should arrive soon. it compiles fine on both i586 & > >> > x86_64, and it seem we fixed the only problem arisen in perl-URPM. > >> > > >> > since other packages need to be rebuilt in the same loop, and given > >> > that urpmi is written in perl, it needs a special treatment to bypass > >> > the regular bs upload. > >> > > >> > blino will likely do this magic dance & upload them in the coming > >> > hours - you may want to wait till his final go before updating your > >> > cauldron box. > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I've uploaded perl 5.14 last night. > >> (I just had to update perl-FCGI to a newer version, since it didn't > >> build anymore) > >> > >> Help is welcome to rebuild perlapi-5.12-dependent packages. > >> > >> Thanks Jérôme! > > > > I'll help to build > > Thanks for helping but > 1) Please use a better changelog message, like "Rebuild for perl > 5.14". Increase rel for rebuild is not interesting when looking at the > history of a package. OK will do next time > 2) How did you get the list of packages to rebuild? You seem to > rebuild packages which don't need to be rebuilt. I noticed > perl-Youri-Package which I wouldn't expect needing to be rebuilt.
I am not a perl guru. I agreed with sander85 to start at the end so we don't both work on the same packages. I used this list: http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/data/src.txt Will it hurt to build one that is not needed? > > > # rpm -qp --requires > /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/1/i586/media/core/release/perl-Youri-Package-0.2 > .2-4.mga1.noarch.rpm perl-version > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 > rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 > perl-base >= 2:5.12.3 > rpmlib(PayloadIsLzma) <= 4.4.6-1 > > It does not depend on perlapi-5.12 -- Thomas
