On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Michael Scherer <[email protected]> wrote: > Le samedi 16 juillet 2011 à 04:31 -0700, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU a écrit : >> >> > Please understand linux 3.0 is just a different name for 2.6.40, there's >> > nothing special about it. So a kernel-desktop-latest3 doesn't make any >> > sense. >> >> ok, then how about >> kernel-desktop-latest-unstable >> kernel-desktop-latest-rc >> kernel-desktop-latest-beta >> ? >> >> because it's not a properly tested kernel. > > Yes, and we could even have a whole distribution dedicated to have > packages to be tested.
and could we call it cauldron ? :)
