>Well, LO is probably exception, AFAIK mostly due to its building troubles but
>at least KDE has always had almost all alphas and betas and RCs in >cooker/cauldron KDE is the main reason I'm using Cauldron. Since KDE 4.0.0, KDE is never "good/stable enough", so it _always_ makes sense to install all the RCs. (There are some DEs that are never "stable enough". Or, when they are really polished -- think KDE 3.5.10 or GNOME 2.32 --, there are some benevolent teams of dictators who decide to jump to an unstable boat -- thinl KDE 4.0.0, GNOME 3.0.) I've seen no betas here, only RCs (4.6.3 -> 4.6.4 -> 4.6.90 -> 4.6.95). Fair enough. But I should unsubscribe from all these lists. I could never get along with the Linux and FreeBSD developers -- too proud of themselves. R-C
