On 16 July 2011 11:11, Anssi Hannula <[email protected]> wrote: > On 15.07.2011 11:10, Ahmad Samir wrote: >> Hello. >> >> As you've seen the thread, posted by Charles A Edwards, there's a new >> version of flash which has native 64bit support, it's still in beta >> but seems to work well, some questions: >> - Any objections about offering it in mga1? on x86_64 only and keeping >> the 32bit stable one as is for now; not having to install >> nspluginwrapper or a 32bit browser on a 64bit system is an >> improvement, IMHO. >> >> - For Cauldron: >> o Do we ship the 11 beta1 for both arch? >> o Just x86_64 and keep the 32bit stable flash for now >> o Keep the 32bit stable and create another spec (Name: >> flash-player-pluing11) for 11 beta1? this way 32bit users will have a >> choice to install the version they want. >> >> WDYT? > > I'd provide it as 'flash-player-plugin11' or 'flash-player-plugin-beta' > for both cauldron and mga1. >
I had started working on flash-player-plugin11 yesterday (based on the current spec and the old PLF flash-player10.2). > -- > Anssi Hannula > -- Ahmad Samir
