On 16 July 2011 14:02, Ahmad Samir <[email protected]> wrote: > On 16 July 2011 11:11, Anssi Hannula <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 15.07.2011 11:10, Ahmad Samir wrote: >>> Hello. >>> >>> As you've seen the thread, posted by Charles A Edwards, there's a new >>> version of flash which has native 64bit support, it's still in beta >>> but seems to work well, some questions: >>> - Any objections about offering it in mga1? on x86_64 only and keeping >>> the 32bit stable one as is for now; not having to install >>> nspluginwrapper or a 32bit browser on a 64bit system is an >>> improvement, IMHO. >>> >>> - For Cauldron: >>> o Do we ship the 11 beta1 for both arch? >>> o Just x86_64 and keep the 32bit stable flash for now >>> o Keep the 32bit stable and create another spec (Name: >>> flash-player-pluing11) for 11 beta1? this way 32bit users will have a >>> choice to install the version they want. >>> >>> WDYT? >> >> I'd provide it as 'flash-player-plugin11' or 'flash-player-plugin-beta' >> for both cauldron and mga1. >> > > I had started working on flash-player-plugin11 yesterday (based on the > current spec and the old PLF flash-player10.2). >
I've imported it in Cauldron. @Anssi (since you worked on the flash spec the most), please review, feel free to fix anything I missed. >> -- >> Anssi Hannula >> > > > > -- > Ahmad Samir > -- Ahmad Samir
