Le vendredi 29 juillet 2011 10:25:02, Colin Guthrie a écrit : > 'Twas brillig, and Samuel Verschelde at 28/07/11 13:11 did gyre and gimble: > > Le jeudi 28 juillet 2011 13:02:26, Colin Guthrie a écrit : > >> 'Twas brillig, and Samuel Verschelde at 28/07/11 09:08 did gyre and gimble: > >>> We have updates blocked by this release 0 issue, so we need a quick > >>> decision. I propose that if tomorrow nobody reacted against the > >>> proposal, it will be adopted. > >> > >> Personally, I would vote to keep it the way it is with the 0 releases. > >> > >> I'm not convinced that any of the arguments represent real world > >> problems. > >> > >> Col > > > > Here is a question I got yesterday, which the proposal solves, but that's > > not a very common issue and maybe the 0 releases way works with it too : > > > > If we had imported it before mageia 1 was released, we would have had > > cultivation-9-0.20071217.6.mga1 in mageia 1 (a pre-release). > > > > Then suppose we want to update it to the final 9 release in both cauldron > > and mageia 1 : we have cultivation-9-1.mga1 in cauldron. But what > > release should we use in updates for mageia 1 ? > > > > cultivation-9-0.1.mga1 doesn't work because cultivation-9-0.1.mga1 < > > cultivation-9-0.20071217.6.mga1 > > > > Is there a way to do it right with a 0 release ? > > Yeah, I concede that this particular scenario would cause problems :s > > Fair point, well made :D > > Col
Does it mean that you agree with the proposal ? Not that I badly want it to be adopted, but I really would like to unlock the current updates in the pipe :) Samuel
