Le jeudi 28 juillet 2011 10:08:44, Samuel Verschelde a écrit : > Le mercredi 27 juillet 2011 22:52:00, Samuel Verschelde a écrit : > > Le mercredi 27 juillet 2011 16:59:37, Samuel Verschelde a écrit : > > > > > > Ok, there will be no meeting tonight, so let's decide it on the ML. Was > > > everyone convinced by misc's demonstration and do we agree to stop > > > using the 0 release for updates and activate the > > > Youri::Submit::Test::Precedence check on submit to prevent higher > > > releases in mageia n than in mageia n+1 ? > > > > > > And if yes do we use subrels for subsequent modifications of packages > > > that are proper to the mageia 1 branch ? > > > > > > I vote yes for both questions. > > > > > > Samuel > > > > Just to make things clear, contrarily as what was said in some of the > > previous mails, I was told on IRC by misc and dmorgan that we should > > always use subrels for updates. > > > > So this means that, when pushing foo-2-1.mga2 from cauldron to 1/updates, > > it will become foo-2-1.1.mga1 and not foo-2-1.mga1 > > > > It means also that you will have to bump the release in cauldron in order > > to be allowed to submit the update, in that case. But as misc said, it > > should not happen very often : > > - providing new versions as updates should remain an exception per > > updates policy > > - if the package in cauldron already has a release > 1, no need to bump > > it > > > > Hope it's clear. > > > > Best regards > > > > Samuel Verschelde > > We have updates blocked by this release 0 issue, so we need a quick > decision. I propose that if tomorrow nobody reacted against the proposal, > it will be adopted. > > Best regards > > Samuel
As promised, I'm going to update the updates policy regarding release and to fix the release for updates currently staging in updates_testing when they need to. Best regards Samuel Verschelde
