On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 03:32:36PM +0200, Guillaume wrote in <[email protected]>:
    >guillomovitch, pterjan

I'm a bit unconfortable with the fact I just game some hints for both of
the issues to help resolution, and now it seems I'm been automatically
granted the responsability of terminating the job, because there is no
one else to do it... What should I answer here "No, thank you, I'd
already did it if I was really interested" ?

Or maybe you could just answer to dmorgan who asked 7 days ago if you
want to take care of it or let him do it ? :)

Which I did immediatly on IRC, thanks to takes cares of it.

Ok, but you can't expect the triage team to read and remember everything from
IRC, so if you don't say it in the bug report you can't blame Manuel for
trying to infer who is working on the bug from limited information.
Which confirm my feeling than avoiding interaction with the triage team is the best way to avoid endless self-justification.

Well, the triage team is not your enemy in this. You said it was not correct to list you as responsible packager for this bug, the bug report was updated accordingly, and that's the end of the story.

If we leave every report that is opened against a package without a maintainer untriaged, the distribution as a whole will be no better for it.

Anyways, thanks for your patch for this particular bug report :-)

Cheers,

Remco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to