Le mardi 13 septembre 2011 15:32:36, Guillaume Rousse a écrit : > Le 13/09/2011 12:15, Samuel Verschelde a écrit : > > Le mardi 13 septembre 2011 11:58:50, Guillaume Rousse a écrit : > >> Le 13/09/2011 10:44, Samuel Verschelde a écrit : > >>> Le mardi 13 septembre 2011 09:17:17, Guillaume Rousse a écrit : > >>>> Le 12/09/2011 22:03, Manuel Hiebel a écrit : > >>>>> ###### > >>>>> > >>>>> Waiting/response of packager: > >>>>> * 1948 nagios 2011-06-28 15:41 CEST by Stew Benedict > >>>>> > >>>>> Modified: 2011-09-06 02:56 CEST > >>>>> > > >>>>> >guillomovitch > >>>>> > > >>>>> * 2064 krb5 2011-07-07 15:44 CEST by Stew Benedict > >>>>> > >>>>> Modified: 2011-09-06 02:44 CEST > >>>>> > > >>>>> >guillomovitch, pterjan > >>>> > >>>> I'm a bit unconfortable with the fact I just game some hints for both > >>>> of the issues to help resolution, and now it seems I'm been > >>>> automatically granted the responsability of terminating the job, > >>>> because there is no one else to do it... What should I answer here > >>>> "No, thank you, I'd already did it if I was really interested" ? > >>> > >>> Or maybe you could just answer to dmorgan who asked 7 days ago if you > >>> want to take care of it or let him do it ? :) > >> > >> Which I did immediatly on IRC, thanks to takes cares of it. > > > > Ok, but you can't expect the triage team to read and remember everything > > from IRC, so if you don't say it in the bug report you can't blame > > Manuel for trying to infer who is working on the bug from limited > > information. > > Which confirm my feeling than avoiding interaction with the triage team > is the best way to avoid endless self-justification.
You are the only one talking about justification. We just need information. Samuel
