On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Philippe Reynes <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > I've tried to use E17, but it's an old version. I've asked e17 team, > and they answered me that E17 is "rolling release". So no > stable release (or vert vert few). > I propose to package svn version, so we could be up-to-date. > If a problem occurs, we could report it to upstream. > I've started such change, for example on eina, the change is : > Index: SPECS/eina.spec > =================================================================== > --- SPECS/eina.spec (révision 151537) > +++ SPECS/eina.spec (copie de travail) > @@ -1,14 +1,15 @@ > %define major 1 > %define libname %mklibname %{name} %major > %define libnamedev %mklibname %{name} -d > +%define svn r64257 > > Summary: Data Type Library > Name: eina > -Version: 1.0.1 > -Release: %mkrel 2 > +Version: 1.1.0 > +Release: %mkrel 0.%svn.1 > License: LGPLv2+ > Group: Graphical desktop/Enlightenment > -Source: > http://download.enlightenment.org/releases/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 > +Source: http://download.enlightenment.org/releases/%{name}-%{svn}.tar.bz2 > URL: http://www.enlightenment.org/ > > %description > @@ -32,9 +33,10 @@ > %{name} development headers and libraries. > > %prep > -%setup -qn %{name}-%{version} > +%setup -qn %{name} > > %build > +sh autogen.sh > %configure2_5x > %make > What do you think about doing it on all E17 package ?
if there is really no stable i like this so for me this is a go ( minus my previous mail ;) )
