Am 22.10.2011 13:34, schrieb D.Morgan:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Philippe Reynes<[email protected]>  wrote:
Hi,
I've tried to use E17, but it's an old version. I've asked e17 team,
and they answered me that E17 is "rolling release". So no
stable release (or vert vert few).
I propose to package svn version, so we could be up-to-date.
If a problem occurs, we could report it to upstream.
I've started such change, for example on eina, the change is :
Index: SPECS/eina.spec
===================================================================
--- SPECS/eina.spec     (révision 151537)
+++ SPECS/eina.spec     (copie de travail)
@@ -1,14 +1,15 @@
  %define major 1
  %define libname %mklibname %{name} %major
  %define libnamedev %mklibname %{name} -d
+%define svn r64257

  Summary: Data Type Library
  Name: eina
-Version: 1.0.1
-Release: %mkrel 2
+Version: 1.1.0
+Release: %mkrel 0.%svn.1
  License: LGPLv2+
  Group: Graphical desktop/Enlightenment
-Source:
http://download.enlightenment.org/releases/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
+Source: http://download.enlightenment.org/releases/%{name}-%{svn}.tar.bz2
  URL: http://www.enlightenment.org/

  %description
@@ -32,9 +33,10 @@
  %{name} development headers and libraries.

  %prep
-%setup -qn %{name}-%{version}
+%setup -qn %{name}

  %build
+sh autogen.sh
  %configure2_5x
  %make
What do you think about doing it on all E17 package ?
if there is really no stable i like this so for me this is a go (
minus my previous mail ;) )

Well, there are "stable" snapshots from time to time, but they are
not done regularly. I'd say if we can make local builds of a newer SVN snapshot
of the whole E17 before Mageia 2 alpha (i.e. in the next ~20 days)
then we should at least try it.

BTW: I'd remove the Source URL when only using snapshots or
change the SPEC in a way that make using SVN snapshots possible
by only changing a macro.

Reply via email to