On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Maarten Vanraes <[email protected]> wrote: > Op maandag 31 oktober 2011 21:19:13 schreef Samuel Verschelde: >> Le lundi 31 octobre 2011 20:37:14, Maarten Vanraes a écrit : >> > Op maandag 31 oktober 2011 13:16:55 schreef Manuel Hiebel: >> > [...] >> > >> > > ##Package with more than 3 bugs: >> > > 2392, 3200, 3198;"chromium-browser" >> > > 2249, 2740, 3199, 2449, 1633;"desktop-common-data" >> > > 1867, 2650, 2644, 2653, 2627;"evolution" >> > > 1857, 1721, 2937;"f-spot" >> > > 942, 1483, 2628;"gdm" >> > > 416, 2888, 1759, 2121;"grub" >> > > 1245, 1527, 1560, 2614, 2707, 2803, 2916;"initscripts" >> > > 447, 999, 1082 2269, 2842 2994;"meta-task" >> > > 1508, 1590, 2927, 3212, 1568, 2218, 2374, 2775, 3042, 3133;"mgaonline" >> > > 1525, 375, 414, 2995, 2996;"mkinitrd" >> > > 3192, 2503, 2879, 2892;"pam" >> > > 1481, 2184, 1454, 2404, 2738;"system-config-printer >> > > 2834;"task-printing-scanning" >> > > 1303, 1712, 2951;"udev" >> > > 2190, 2192, 3057, 3224;"xfce4-session" >> > > 758, 2194, 1908;"xinitrc" >> > >> > I vote to drop chromium and evolution and xfce4-session and gdm, because >> > no maintainer and too much open bugs. and i don't use them :-) >> > >> > also i wonder why mgaonline has so many bugs... >> >> I know this is a joke, but dropping packages from cauldron doesn't remove >> bugs from Mageia 1 :) >> >> Samuel > > ok, what about dropping it from Mageia 1 as well? just have task-mageia > require deletion of chromium-browser ... > > But seriously, if we can't maintain/fix something like chromium-browser, we > should just drop it completely, maybe have a get-chromium package instead >
why ? i package it regularly and tvignaud too. what about dropping all packages that have bugs ? this is just stupid and you should first ask ppl packaging it before giving such ideas
