On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Colin Guthrie <[email protected]> wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Maarten Vanraes at 31/10/11 20:55 did gyre and gimble: >> Op maandag 31 oktober 2011 21:34:04 schreef D.Morgan: >> [...] >>>> But seriously, if we can't maintain/fix something like chromium-browser, >>>> we should just drop it completely, maybe have a get-chromium package >>>> instead >>> >>> why ? i package it regularly and tvignaud too. >>> what about dropping all packages that have bugs ? this is just stupid >>> and you should first ask ppl packaging it before giving such ideas >> >> ok, i get it, (allthough i did say "IF") I guess it's a misguided attempt of >> myself to get more maintainership... > > I think the attempts to get more official partnerships by Samuel and > yourself are very valuable, but by the same token, I think we need to > accept that having a single maintainer for some packages just doens't > make sense. > > For example things like initscripts, udev, systemd etc. should be > maintained by a "core" team, and IMO, not a single person (tho' if > someone steps up and is proven to be reliable then this is obviously not > a bad thing per-se!). I'm certainly happy to help out here. > > This is a bit OT for this thread tho'... :)
i completly agree on your point.
