On Tuesday 01 November 2011 13:24, Michael Scherer wrote: > I suggest to re-read the other mails of the thread, especially the one > where I give this url : > http://www.spinics.net/lists/fedora-devel/msg158642.html
I have read the entire thread on the Fedora list, every message, including that specific message, and I have done the same for this thread here and my question is not answered. So I'll ask again: what substantial benefit do I get by having / and usr on the same filesystem / partition? I can agree to some extend on moving /*bin and co. to /usr, But what is the benefit on requireing /usr NOT to be a separate filesystem? Judging by this thread and the Fedora thread I am not alone on having seriosus doubts on this issiue. > ( PS: please try to not insult others with saying thing like "most > stupid thing ever performed" ). I'm sorry if someone feel trampled upon, but when I see something which I really do think is stupid and idiotic, I reserve the right to say so. If someone can't handle that, tough luck! Note: I am not, nor have I called anyone stupid or an idiot. I am calling this filesystem requirement change stupid and idiotic. There's a difference. :-)= -- Johnny A. Solbu PGP key ID: 0xFA687324
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
