On Tue, 01 Nov 2011, Johnny A. Solbu wrote: > On Tuesday 01 November 2011 13:24, Michael Scherer wrote: > > I suggest to re-read the other mails of the thread, especially the one > > where I give this url : > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/fedora-devel/msg158642.html > > I have read the entire thread on the Fedora list, every message, including > that specific message, and I have done the same for this thread here and my > question is not answered. > > So I'll ask again: what substantial benefit do I get by having / and usr on > the same filesystem / partition? > I can agree to some extend on moving /*bin and co. to /usr, But what is the > benefit on requireing /usr NOT to be a separate filesystem?
From what I understood, it's ok to have / and /usr on a separate filesystem, as long as /usr is mounted in initramfs.
