Op maandag 07 november 2011 23:52:50 schreef José Jorge: > Le lundi 7 novembre 2011 22:13:53, Maarten Vanraes a écrit : > > i light of the idea behind the rules, i would say that this package could > > be a either an update or a backport... maybe a ruling for only this > > package is required to do so? > > 6 features introduced in Kdenlive 0.8.2 > > I don't like this idea, because a new version is also new features, and so > new bugs. What if we end with a new outstanding bug that is more important > than the old crashes? We will have to revert back, using an epoch. > > Yes we are waiting for backports for a long time, but it is upstream > responsibility to maintain released versions. They don't do that, so we > only should send new ( mlt + kdenlive + openshot) to backports. > > I feel I know this problem well, as I worked a lot with kdenlive : > http://lachuteduneplume.free.fr/?Technical > > If an update had bumped me to 0.6, my work would have been lost, this is > NOT what I expect from an update.
my wife uses kdenlive, right now, you think that update would destroy her work?
