2011/11/7 José Jorge <[email protected]>: > Le lundi 7 novembre 2011 22:13:53, Maarten Vanraes a écrit : > > 6 features introduced in Kdenlive 0.8.2 > > I don't like this idea, because a new version is also new features, and so > new bugs. What if we end with a new outstanding bug that is more important > than the old crashes? We will have to revert back, using an epoch. >
You are only speculating of possible bugs that could appear with these new features, but we are talking about 151 *confirmed* bugs, from which 44 are crashes that also for sure, will make someone loose their work and make him angry at us. Also those 6 new features seem minor and more of a cosmetic nature for most of them, I don't think they can introduce any serious bug like a crash. > Yes we are waiting for backports for a long time, but it is upstream > responsibility to maintain released versions. They don't do that, so we only > should send new ( mlt + kdenlive + openshot) to backports. > Even so backports were open I think that because of the huge amount of bug fixes this version should be push as an update instead of a backport. > I feel I know this problem well, as I worked a lot with kdenlive : > http://lachuteduneplume.free.fr/?Technical > > If an update had bumped me to 0.6, my work would have been lost, this is NOT > what I expect from an update. Of course no one expects to loose work, but in your same line of thought, actual users of our version of kdenlive also don't expect to loose their work because of a crash if there's a fix available and we aren't providing it. Juancho
