07.03.2012 23:13, Samuel Verschelde kirjoitti: > Le mercredi 7 mars 2012 20:48:26, Remco Rijnders a écrit : >> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 08:45:49PM +0100, nicolas wrote in >> >> <[email protected]>: >>> On Wed, 07 Mar 2012, Samuel Verschelde wrote: >>>> Should we increase the epoch to keep ugrade path from beta, or drop and >>>> replace the package ? >>> >>> epoch should be used only to fix updates on stable releases. For >>> cauldron, users should be asked to remove and reinstall the package. >> >> Out of interest and as learning experience... won't the buildsystem have a >> fit over being given an older version to build than it has in its >> repositories already? > > There must be a sysadmin intervention to remove the old packages before > submitting the new ones. > > libtorrent and rtorrent are ready in SVN to submit. Can someone remove the > old > packages and submit the new ones? If someone wants to double-check the > changes > to check we did no mistake, please do too.
You added SILENT to the commit messages while this is a major change, it doesn't make sense. The rpms got "+ rebuild (emptylog)" as the log instead, which is not what happened. -- Anssi Hannula
