Le mercredi 7 mars 2012 22:33:19, Anssi Hannula a écrit : > 07.03.2012 23:13, Samuel Verschelde kirjoitti: > > Le mercredi 7 mars 2012 20:48:26, Remco Rijnders a écrit : > >> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 08:45:49PM +0100, nicolas wrote in > >> > >> <[email protected]>: > >>> On Wed, 07 Mar 2012, Samuel Verschelde wrote: > >>>> Should we increase the epoch to keep ugrade path from beta, or drop > >>>> and replace the package ? > >>> > >>> epoch should be used only to fix updates on stable releases. For > >>> cauldron, users should be asked to remove and reinstall the package. > >> > >> Out of interest and as learning experience... won't the buildsystem have > >> a fit over being given an older version to build than it has in its > >> repositories already? > > > > There must be a sysadmin intervention to remove the old packages before > > submitting the new ones. > > > > libtorrent and rtorrent are ready in SVN to submit. Can someone remove > > the old packages and submit the new ones? If someone wants to > > double-check the changes to check we did no mistake, please do too. > > You added SILENT to the commit messages while this is a major change, it > doesn't make sense. > > The rpms got "+ rebuild (emptylog)" as the log instead, which is not > what happened.
Indeed, remmy will fix the commit messages and then I'll submit again to fix the changelogs. Samuel
