Hi Guillaume, On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Guillaume Rousse <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 30/03/2012 15:04, Christian Lohmaier a écrit : >> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Dimitrios Glentadakis<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Well - that is what he said: >> "Don't push security updates to users by replacing package A by package >> B." >> Or: "I don't care that other people will continue using software with >> security flaws, since I know what I am doing." > > That is pure over-interpretation of my argumentation. I could be as well > irrespective of your point of view by replying "you lie".
I think that paraphrasing matched what you were writing prettly closely. But let's use a few quotes then: "[...] don't treat uses as blatant idiots. If I want to keep a proprietary JRE [...] that is my choice, not yours." "I think I'm best placed than anyone else to evaluate the exact risk I'm facing on the machines I'm running [...]. The decision [...] belongs to me. You [Mageia] are not a system administrator [...], you are a technical solution provider. You're clearly confusing the roles here." If that is not reading: Don't push the security updates to the users, let the user take care of that manually, then what else? Sure, call me lying, but then I call you schizophrenic. ciao Christian
