> 'Twas brillig, and David Walser at 11/06/12 01:32 did gyre and gimble: [...] >> Indeed. I wish there was an easier way to know what needs to be rebuilt >> when things get updated. > > Well it the .so name does not change then it *should* be ABI compatible. > It seems in this case it's only API compatible but that doesn't rule out > certain values, macros or flags changing such that everything needs a > recompile. > >> Just FYI, Mandriva rebuilt a whole bunch of stuff when they updated to >> openssl 1.0.1. >> >> PS - the same was true when they updated to ffmpeg 0.11, and we haven't >> follwed suit on that either. > > Well, as above it shouldn't be necessary, but "shouldn't" are "isn't" > are two different things....
perhaps, after submission, it could suggest which are dependant on what you've just submitted?
