'Twas brillig, and Sander Lepik at 11/06/12 11:44 did gyre and gimble: > On Jun 11, 2012 1:14 PM, "Colin Guthrie" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> 'Twas brillig, and Guillaume Rousse at 11/06/12 10:19 did gyre and gimble: >> > Le 11/06/2012 09:56, Colin Guthrie a écrit : >> >> Well it the .so name does not change then it *should* be ABI > compatible. >> >> It seems in this case it's only API compatible but that doesn't > rule out >> >> certain values, macros or flags changing such that everything needs a >> >> recompile. >> > Just rebuilding openssl with different build options already triggered >> > such kind of issues. I remember adding SNI support broke ntp in the >> > past, until this last package was rebuilt. The safe way should be to >> > rebuild everything right now, but given than almost everything in the >> > distribution uses this library, I think just letting normal update flow >> > should be enough, unless actual problems are found. >> >> Probably true and I think we should ensure that a full rebuild is done >> before the beta cycle anwyay. We did moot this for mga2 but it was >> deemed (correctly IMO) too late to start messing with that. >> >> But until then a full rebuild is likely overkill. > What about gcc 4.7? I think we should switch to that one as well. And > then rebuild is needed anyway. So full rebuild at the moment is probably > not the best idea.
+1 -- Colin Guthrie colin(at)mageia.org http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/ Open Source: Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/ PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/ Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/
